Charles R Harris writes:

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Lluís <xscript@gmx.net> wrote: Hi there,

I haven't been able to find an answer after a quick search, but are there any plans regarding the (re)inclusion of missing data support into some future version of numpy?

Not at the moment, but it sits in the back of my mind. Mark's dynd work will include missing values at some point and I think we should see what that looks like. We also need to agree on how they should be interpreted.

They won't be in 1.8, too little time for that.

Thanks for the info. Lluis -- "And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn something new, the whole world becomes that much richer." -- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom Tollbooth