7 Aug
2009
7 Aug
'09
6:32 a.m.
I just meant to +1 the "we need to make a new micro-release right now" paragraph. Logistically, I think it needs to be a full binary release but it could be identical to 3.1 except for the one patch.
Looking at Misc/NEWS, there are a number of worthy bugfixes already in. Why not just do a regular micro-release, reflecting the state of release31-maint? We could stick to the normal procedures -- the only thing different is that we're doing it sooner than planned.
Raymond