On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 13:10 Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> wrote:
Le 22/05/2018 à 22:06, Brett Cannon a écrit :
On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 12:07 Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org <mailto:antoine@python.org>> wrote:
Le 22/05/2018 à 20:58, Barry Warsaw a écrit : > >> Thoughts? (We can dogfood this proposal too, if there's interest.:-)
> > I don't know whether this will help focus rambling PEP discussions. I personally don't love the linearity of GH comments. Threading is useful! What has become of the Discourse experiment?A Discourse experiment was never started. If you mean Zulip it's still going at python.zulipchat.com <http://python.zulipchat.com>.
I meant this, whatever it was: https://discuss.python.org/ :-)
Ah, that never went anywhere because it was just a short experiment that the overload-sig did. If people wanted to do a serious experiment with it then we can discuss it over on core-workflow.
I don't think Zulip works for structured discussion. I also find it slightly less usable than I expected.
Why specifically? Do you still find IRC more usable? Just trying to understand how Discourse would be different enough to solve the issue you're having.
-Brett
Regards
Antoine.
python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/