26 Feb
2012
26 Feb
'12
10:12 a.m.
On 02/26/2012 06:51 AM, Simon Cross wrote:
There are good scientific use cases for nanosecond time resolution (e.g. radio astronomy) where one is actually measuring time down to that level and taking into account propagation delays. I have first hand experience [...] I'm not sure whether any of this is intended to be for or against any side in the current discussion. :D
It's probably neutral. But I do have one question: can you foresee the scientific community moving to a finer resolution than nanoseconds in our lifetimes? //arry/