Sept. 19, 2013
10:25 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldoussoren@mac.com>wrote:
On 14 Sep, 2013, at 8:30, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
However, I agree the current wording only conveys that to the handful of people that already know exactly when in the attribute lookup sequence that step occurs, which is a rather niche audience :)
I've been fooling around with this long enough that I forgot that not everyone knows this :-).
I guess I'd better include a clearer and more complete description of the current attribute resolution protocol and how my proposal affects that. A nice readable Python implementation of that protocol would be nice to have regardless of the fate of this PEP.
+1 -eric