On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:17:02 +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
R. David Murray wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:11:57 -0400, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
On 4/27/2010 5:14 PM, "Martin v. Loewis" wrote:
You only have resolutions on closed issues, Only for 'closed' or also for 'pending' and 'languishing'? If pending were implemented to mean 'auto close in x days', then Resolution would need to be set when Status is set to 'pending'.
Definitely. Resolution should always be set for Pending, IMO.
Note that I'll occasionally use "pending" to mean "committed to at least one branch, still need to port/block remaining branches". (e.g. I did it this week, since 2.7b2 was higher priority than the other branches which don't have near term binary releases coming up).
I've seen others use it that way as well.
Yes, I have noticed that several people do this. This will stop working if we implement autoclose. Other people just leave the issue open and change the targeted versions instead. -- R. David Murray www.bitdance.com