21 Feb
2014
21 Feb
'14
10:40 a.m.
[re: "as" clause] On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
It's probably OK to leave it in the deferred section and just note the difficulty of implementing it in a backwards compatible way, since we're *not* going to be introducing a closure.
Agreed. -eric