Am 20.06.2012 12:39, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:30:51 +0200 Tarek Ziadé <tarek@ziade.org> wrote:
Most of the distutils2 improvements (new PEPs, setup.cfg, etc.) were totally possible in distutils, weren't they?
I started there, remember ? And we ended up saying it was impossible to continue without breaking the packaging world.
"we" were only certain people, AFAIR.
Yes. The people willing to work on packaging in Python, to be exact.
why would you expect a different datapoint ?
I wasn't expecting a different datapoint, I'm pointing that shipping packaging in the stdlib would provide a much better exposure.
But not if it's not ready for prime time. (And providing the finished distutils2 for Python 2 will provide even better exposure at the moment.) Georg