27 May
2001
27 May
'01
3:50 p.m.
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:32:48PM +0100, Michael Hudson wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Tim Peters wrote:
Next question: why isn't builtin_len using METH_OLDARGS instead? Is there some advantage to using METH_VARARGS in this case?
So you can't do
len(1,2) 2
a la list.append, socket.connect pre 2.0? (or was it 1.6?)
And don't forget the method-specific errormessage by passing ':len' in the format string. Of course, this can easily be (and probably should) done by passing another argument to whatever parses arguments in METH_O, rather than invoking string parsing magic every call. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!