[...] publishing patches by referring to a remote repository,
rather than uploading the diff.
Is this a recommended workflow at this point, or should we generate/attach patch files still? Both, for experimentation? ~/santa On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:15 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de>wrote:
As a mercurial user, I thank you for this effort! One question, where/how do I send suggestion to what to add into .hgignore file? In particular, I found these dynamically generated files after a build in Windows (3.2) that probably should be entered as .hgignore entries:
All patches should go to the bug tracker. If you host a clone somewhere, you could start publishing patches by referring to a remote repository, rather than uploading the diff. I'm curious how this DVCS thing works out for contributors.
Regards, Martin