On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:37 AM, <skip@pobox.com> wrote:
How about replacing all the possibilities with
patch incomplete
then elaborate in the issue itself how that is the case.
+1 This is much clearer than lumping incomplete patches in with nonexistent ones. A process that goes "needs patch->patch review->(patch incomplete)->commit review->committed/rejected" (with the possibility of multiple iterations between patch review and patch incomplete) would give a pretty clear idea of where any given issue stands. The "unit test needed" stage is actually more a "confirmation needed" stage - i.e. can the reported bug actually be reproduced by anyone other than the original reporter. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia