Hi,
2014-02-27 11:22 GMT+01:00 Kristján Valur Jónsson
Now, Larry Hastings pointed out that we support C89 which doesn’t support Inlines. Rather than suggesting here that we update that compatibility requirement,
In practice, recent versions of GCC and Clang are used. On Windows, it's Visual Studio 2010. I'm pretty sure that these compilers support inline functions. I'm also in favor of using inline functions instead of long macros using ugly hacks like "instr1,instr2" syntax where instr1 used assert(). See for example unicodeobject.c to have an idea of what horrible macros mean. I'm in favor of dropping C89 support and require at least C99. There is now C11, it's time to drop the old C89. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C11_%28C_standard_revision%29 Victor