
28 Nov
2017
28 Nov
'17
7:51 p.m.
This may have gotten bogged down again. Could we get the output of datetime.isoformat() parsed at a minimum? Perfection is not required.
Looks like there is a patch or two and test cases on the bug.
-Mike
Could anyone put this five year-old bug about parsing iso8601 format date-times on the front burner?
http://bugs.python.org/issue15873
In the comments there's a lot of hand-wringing about different variations that bogged it down, but right now I only need it to handle the output of datetime.isoformat():
>>> dt.isoformat() '2017-10-20T08:20:08.986166+00:00'
Perhaps if we could get that minimum first step in, it could be iterated on and made more lenient in the future.