On Wed, 1 Sep 2021, 7:18 am Senthil Kumaran, <senthil@uthcode.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:57 AM Angus Hollands <goosey15@gmail.com> wrote:
Should look more like ```python x = np.array(...) y = x[2 < x < 8] ``` Is there any interest in pushing this PEP along?
My personal opinion is, it is worth discussing again. I could see the benefits this brings to Numpy Arrays. The PEP itself was deferred based on boolean overload dislike than the short-circuit or chaining operator preference.
While I don't plan to reactivate these PEPs myself, I'd be happy to welcome a co-author that was keen to champion them (535 doesn't stand alone - it depends on the "binary if" and "binary else" circuit breaking protocol proposal in 532). While I believe 535 is mostly OK, 532 needs some updates to account for: * the new language grammar (the PEP was written before the switch to pegen) * the walrus operator (some of the possible future extensions mentioned are irrelevant now) * fixing the diagram rendering and ReST mark up Cheers, Nick.
-- Senthil
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/ENJYFXAD... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/