On Wednesday 15 February 2006 01:44, Greg Ewing wrote:
If the protocol has been sensibly designed, that shouldn't happen, since everything up to the coding marker should be ascii (or some other protocol-defined initial coding).
Indeed.
For protocols that are not sensibly designed (or if you're just trying to guess) what you suggest may be needed. But it would be good to have a nicer way of going about it for when the protocol is sensible.
I agree in principle, but the example of using an HTML <meta> tag as a source of document encoding information isn't sensible. Unfortunately, it's still part of the HTML specification. :-( I'm not opposing a way to do a sensible thing, but wanted to note that it wasn't going to be right for all cases, with such an example having been mentioned already (though the issues with it had not been fully spelled out). -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>