I tried using code blocks while writing PEP 551 but they weren’t highlighted on the python.org rendering. Personally I think it would be great, provided a good colour scheme is available (some default schemes are... not always works of art). I’m not sure who is responsible for that side of things though – presumably it’s just a case of installing pygments. (FWIW, I’m not keen on going back and modifying old PEPs, but I won’t stop someone doing it on their own terms.) Cheers, Steve Top-posted from my Windows phone at North Bay Python From: Wes Turner Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 5:06 To: Python-Dev Subject: [Python-Dev] PEPs: ``.. code:: python`` or ``::`` (syntaxhighlighting) In ReStructuredText, this gets syntax highlighted because of the code directive [1][2][3]: .. code:: python import this def func(*args, **kwargs): pass This also gets syntax highlighted as python[3]: .. code:: python import this def func(*args, **kwargs): pass This does not:: import this def func(*args, **kwargs): pass Syntax highlighting in Docutils 0.9+ is powered by Pygments. If Pygments is not installed, or there is a syntax error, syntax highlighting is absent. GitHub does show Pygments syntax highlighting in .. code:: blocks for .rst and .restructuredtext documents [4] 1. Does the python.org PEP view support .. code:: blocks? [5] 2. Syntax highlighting is an advantage for writers, editors, and readers. 3. Should PEPs use .. code:: blocks to provide this advantage? [1] http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#code [2] http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/markup/code.html [3] http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/config.html#confval-highlight_language [4] https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0557.rst [5] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0557/ https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0458/