20 Jul
2011
20 Jul
'11
2:57 p.m.
At 06:46 PM 7/20/2011 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, P.J. Eby <pje@telecommunity.com> wrote:
So, without further ado, here it is:
I pushed this version up to the PEPs repo, so it now has a number (402) and can be read in prettier HTML format: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0402/
Technically, shouldn't this be a 3XXX series PEP? Or are we not doing those any more now that all PEPs would be 3XXX?