22 May
2018
22 May
'18
8:24 p.m.
On 5/22/2018 8:37 AM, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
Sorry for that. I thought that the bpo issue can be skipped because it is tests-only change, no asyncio code was affected. Will be more accurate next time.
A new issue was not needed. Adding 'bpo-33531' would have been fine, automatically linking the issue and the PR in both directions. -- Terry Jan Reedy