On 28Apr2009 11:49, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote: | Paul Moore <p.f.moore <at> gmail.com> writes: | > | > I've yet to hear anyone claim that they would have an actual problem | > with a specific piece of code they have written. | | Yep, that's the problem. Lots of theoretical problems noone has ever encountered | brought up against a PEP which resolves some actual problems people encounter on | a regular basis. | | For the record, I'm +1 on the PEP being accepted and implemented as soon as | possible (preferably before 3.1). I am also +1 on this. I would like utility functions to perform: os-bytes->funny-encoded funny-encoded->os-bytes or explicit example code snippets for same in the PEP text. -- Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ This person is currently undergoing electric shock therapy at Agnews Developmental Center in San Jose, California. All his opinions are static, please ignore him. Thank you, Nurse Ratched - the sig quote of Bob "Another beer, please" Christ <bhatch@netcom.com>