Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #1172711: Add 'long long' support to the array module.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1726b/1726ba2b828487263f4207552ae0786d5e9f1d07" alt=""
Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti@gmail.com> wrote:
+@unittest.skipIf(not have_long_long, 'need long long support')
I think this would read better with skipUnless and s/have/has/:
@unittest.skipUnless(HAS_LONG_LONG, 'need long long support')
skipUnless() is perhaps a bit cleaner, but have_long_long is pretty established elsewhere (for example in pyport.h). Stefan Krah
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2497/a249737d85eaf8aeadf9033a1485908e3a964aa7" alt=""
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Stefan Krah <stefan@bytereef.org> wrote:
Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti@gmail.com> wrote:
+@unittest.skipIf(not have_long_long, 'need long long support')
I think this would read better with skipUnless and s/have/has/:
@unittest.skipUnless(HAS_LONG_LONG, 'need long long support')
skipUnless() is perhaps a bit cleaner, but have_long_long is pretty established elsewhere (for example in pyport.h).
I agree with Stefan on the have_long_long part. This is what is used in the array module code, struct, ctypes, etc ... (via pyport.h as Stefan mentioned). As for the unless/if, I am OK with the 'if'. 'unless' always causes a double-take for me. Personal preference I guess. -- Meador
participants (2)
-
Meador Inge
-
Stefan Krah