On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
On 11/21/2014 08:22 AM, Andrew Barnert wrote:
Maybe what we need to do is update PEP 3142, gathering all of the alternative ideas, and expanding on the rationale, so Guido can reject that, and next time this comes up, everyone will have something to read before having the same arguments about the same proposals?
Are we accepting nominations? I have the perfect fellow in mind. :)
(And in case Chris decides to nominate me in retaliation, I decline. ;)
Heh! Great, I'm going to get a name for writing the PEPs that exist solely to be rejected... I was hoping PEP 479 would be accepted easily, given who was advocating it, but now it's starting to look like I doomed the proposal :) ChrisA