On 2/1/2019 9:07 AM, James Lu wrote:
I always use ptipython (ptpython shell over the ipython console) for my REPLs. The built-in python repl is not /batteries included/ in the sense that it already has what you need to explore the language.
I wonder, what do the python committers think about including a stripped-down version of ipython and ptpython in the built-in python?
I'm opposed to it. I think the current situation is fine, where CPython ships with a basic REPL, and other REPLs exist. I don't want to see any complexity added to CPython. I'm not opposed to hooks to make it easier for third parties to add functionality to the CPython REPL, but I'd have to see how they complicate things before making up my mind. Eric
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:15 AM Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it <mailto:lele@metapensiero.it>> wrote:
Further magic comes with https://pypi.org/project/xonsh/
ciao, lele. -- nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia. lele@metapensiero.it <mailto:lele@metapensiero.it> | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org <mailto:Python-ideas@python.org> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/