On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Greg Ewing firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
This thread is a huge, multi-day proof that people do not agree that this is a "reasonable" interpretation.
So far I've seen one very vocal person who disgrees, and maybe one other who isn't sure.
And what you're NOT seeing is a whole lot of people (myself included) who have mostly glazed over, unsure what is and isn't reasonable, and not clear enough on either side of the debate to weigh in. (Or not even clear what the two sides are.)