On 12 Feb 2014 19:54, "Terry Reedy" <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
On 2/12/2014 4:24 AM, David Foster wrote:
Tulip, however, does not appear to address a slightly different problem I run into where I need different parts of the same conceptual function to run on specific *different* threads. Consider the following code which needs different parts executed on a UI thread, database thread, and background thread:
... There is a tulip google group where tulip discussion takes place. I don't
have the specific reference though. With 3.4 nearing release, I suspect we're going to have to get used to the idea of gently redirecting pip and asyncio/tulip discussions :) An update to the "communications" section of the dev guide may be in order, too. Cheers, Nick.
-- Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/