24 Apr
2015
24 Apr
'15
9:15 p.m.
On 25 April 2015 at 16:02, Nick Coghlan ncoghlan@gmail.com wrote:
While it's a less significant behavioural difference than being a generator function, a non-empty closure could conceivably also be reported in the repr():
<function foo at 0x7f7dad9f7bf8 (closure)> <function foo at 0x7f7dad9f7bf8 (closure,generator)>
I like this suggestion. Doing it for the await changes as well would be great.
-Rob
--
Robert Collins rbtcollins@hp.com
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud