On 15 October 2016 at 16:27, Chris Angelico firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Mikhail V email@example.com wrote:
But I can bravely claim that it is better than *any* hex notation, it just follows from what I have here on paper on my table, namely that it is physically impossible to make up highly effective glyph system of more than 8 symbols.
You should go and hang out with jmf. Both of you have made bold assertions that our current system is physically/mathematically
Who is jmf?
impossible, despite the fact that *it is working*. Neither of you can cite any actual scientific research to back your claims.
No, please don't ask that. I have enough work in real life. And you tend to understand too literally my words here.