22 Jul
2010
22 Jul
'10
12:56 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
Still, the early binding semantics angle is one I had thought about before - that *is* a genuinely new feature of this proposal. Perhaps not a hugely compelling one though - I think I've only needed to use the default argument hack once in the whole time I've been programming Python.
Uhh, "... had*n't* thought about ...". 3 little missing characters that completely reverse the intended meaning of a sentence :P Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia