19 Feb
2010
19 Feb
'10
5:12 p.m.
Since .next() seems to be equivalent to .send(None), why wasn't .next() just given an optional parameter which defaults to None? - Andrey On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Simon Forman <sajmikins@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Andrey Fedorov <anfedorov@gmail.com> wrote:
As far as I can tell, a generator's .next() is equivalent to .send(None). Is this true?
They are equivalent AFAIK.
If so, [why] aren't they unified in a method with a single argument which defaults to None? - Andrey
next() predates send().