Hi Philippe, Thanks for preparing the PEP! I also think it will improve the readability a lot in code that heavily uses type annotations. I'd suggest you to split this PEP in two: one for Union types and another one for Optional. It will facilitate the discussions and reaching consensus since these are actually two separate issues. For example, I endorse the proposal for "|" operator, while I have some reservations about "~" (e.g., ~~x is expected to be x?). I'm not a core developer, though, so maybe they prefer joint PEPs rather than seperate ones. Cheers, Marko Le mar. 17 sept. 2019 à 08:56, Philippe Prados <philippe.prados@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to publish a new PEP (see here <https://github.com/pprados/peps/blob/master/pep-9999.rst>). I discussed this idea here <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/thread/FCTXGDT...> . The PEP1 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001/> explains that I must have a sponsor.
Who can help me ?
Thanks
Philippe Prados _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/WWSOVK... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/