12 Apr
2012
12 Apr
'12
11:33 a.m.
Greg Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> writes:
An obvious thing to do is to try them in the order they appear in the sequence. That would argue against allowing an unordered collection.
For that reason, I'm −0.5 on the proposal. If we're to specify multiple match patterns and do them all in a single operation, I'd prefer to specify them in e.g. a set or some other efficient non-ordered collection. -- \ “On the other hand, you have different fingers.” —Steven Wright | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney