On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:13 AM Stephen J. Turnbull firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Michael Selik writes:
However, PEP 1 does not give instruction on how to evaluate whether that discussion has been completed satisfactorily.
That's because completion of discussion has never been a requirement for writing a PEP.
Not for drafting, but for submitting. For my own PEP submission, I received the specific feedback that it needed a "proper title" before being assigned a PEP number. My goal for submitting the draft was to receive a PEP number to avoid the awkwardness of discussing a PEP without an obvious title. Perhaps PEP 1 should be revised to clarify the expectations for PEP submission.