10 Mar
2016
10 Mar
'16
2:48 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Rob Cliffe <rob.cliffe@btinternet.com> wrote: [...]
[foo(x) for x in things if is not None] # What you wrote is already valid syntax, equivalent to [foo(x) for x in things]
Oh, of course! Thanks. I suppose my confusion may be an argument against the syntax ;) -- Koos