On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Paul Moore email@example.com wrote:
On 13 October 2017 at 23:30, Yury Selivanov firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
At this point of time, there's just one place which describes one well defined semantics: PEP 550 latest version. Paul, if you have time/interest, please take a look at it, and say what's confusing there.
Hi Yury, The following is my impressions from a read-through of the initial part of the PEP. tl; dr - you say "concurrent" too much and it makes my head hurt :-) [..] I hope this is of some use. I appreciate I'm talking about a pretty wholesale rewrite, and it's quite far down the line to be suggesting such a thing. I'll understand if you don't feel it's worthwhile to take that route.
Thanks a lot for this detailed analysis. Even though PEP 550 isn't going to make it to 3.7 and I'm not going to edit/rewrite it anymore, I'll try to incorporate some of your feedback into the new PEP.