24 Aug
2013
24 Aug
'13
11:26 p.m.
On 25/08/13 07:54, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
Well, the name is pretty self-explanatory. I'm working on a patch right now. It my tests(I went through the file and replaced all occurrences of 'gcc' with 'clang'), everything compiled fine. I can't see an reason why it'd hurt something.
Are you suggesting that the maintainer of distutils should take over maintenance of clang, in order to make clang a part of distutils? Do the current maintainers of clang get a say in this? If that's not what you mean, perhaps what you mean isn't quite so self-explanatory as you think. In what sense should clang be added to distutils? gcc isn't currently part of distutils. It's an external dependency, not an internal component. -- Steven