On 2019-09-08 11:17, Mark @pysoniq wrote:
Hi, David,
In several other posts here, I have distinguished PysoniQ from the open source projects mentioned. It has much better ease of use and faster published metrics than the other projects mentioned. The faster metrics should not be surprising when technologies like LLVM are cut out of the loop and you translate Python directly to assembly. The translate "directly" is critical for performance.
When you say, "But it's also not like there aren't already 5 or more open source projects that do a similar thing better already" can you be specific and provide examples of how they are better?
It's great that you are responding to all these nitpicks about what PysoniQ does and doesn't do and how it is or isn't better than other things. But I still haven't seen your response to Chris Angelico's question, which I'll reiterate here: what is your "idea"? You just keep posting about the features of PysoniQ without explaining why you've even brought it up on this list. What action are you intending anyone here to take? Are you planning for PysoniQ to be incorporated into core Python? -- Brendan Barnwell "Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is no path, and leave a trail." --author unknown