4 Jun 2019 4 Jun '19
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:21 AM Rhodri James firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On 04/06/2019 11:06, Yanghao Hua wrote:
[...] what I needed is an operator that does not collide with all existing number/matrix operators.
That's the question that in all your thousands of words of argument you still haven't answered beyond "because I want it."
All existing operators are actually already meaningful for HDLs, so using one for assignment would mean it wouldn't be able to be used for its "natural" operation. As Yanghao mentioned, the likeliest to use would be the in-place matmul operator (@=) but there are use cases where matrix-multiplication of signals would actually be useful too.