30 May
2007
30 May
'07
11:05 p.m.
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
Why not just drop the 'x for' at the start of a 'filter comprehension' (or generator expression)? Thus (3) could be written more simply as:
(3') [x in L if p(x)]
It would be very nice, but could be difficult to parse, because there's no clue you're not looking at a normal list constructor until you get to the 'if'.
--
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiem! |
Christchurch, New Zealand | (I'm not a morning person.) |
greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+