Just to clarify, PEP 315 had to do with a do-while concept (to make common use of pre-while code that often exists) and not the (dubious) issue of: for X in listY while conditionZ: or for X in listY and conditionZ: (fwhile) Right? There seemed to be some confusion, but maybe they are related, but I'm not sure how.... -Jim -----Original Message----- From: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl> To: Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> Cc: Python-Ideas <python-ideas@python.org> Sent: Wed, Jun 26, 2013 11:40 am Subject: Re: [Python-ideas] PEP 315: do-while On 26 cze 2013, at 17:03, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote: Please reject the PEP. More variations along these lines won't make the language more elegant or easier to learn. They'd just save a few hasty folks some typing while making others who have to read/maintain their code wonder what it means. Done. PEP 315 has been rejected. http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/21deefe50c51 -- Best regards, Łukasz Langa WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/ Twitter: @llanga IRC: ambv on #python-dev _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas