10 Oct
2012
10 Oct
'12
7:13 p.m.
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 00:45:41 +0530 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't like any of those; I'd vote for another regular method, maybe p.pathjoin(q). [...] I don't *love* joinpath as a name, I just don't actively dislike it
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote: the way I do the four presented options (and it has the virtue of the path.py precedent).
How about one_path.to(other_path) ?
.to -> +0 .add -> +1