I agree, I think it could be a combined scipy effort. Going to need some Astropy magic for the data io (probably) and the Ra/Dec coordinate handling. Then we can use sklearn and potentially astroml once we have a detection routine? Stop me if this sounds crazy. Stuart On 13 Mar 2014 00:21, "Michael Aye" <kmichael.aye@gmail.com> wrote:
I would be joining. But I believe this is not winnable without ML, i.e. only image processing won't do the job. Michael
On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 4:53:26 PM UTC-7, Ronnie Ghose wrote:
i'll go get my sword @stefan :)
but great application of ML :3, NASA gets a lot of those false positive things
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <ste...@sun.ac.za>wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Stuart Mumford <stu...@mumford.me.uk>wrote:
I would be willing to contribute but I am already run off my feet, so I really can't offer much.
Josh?
Stéfan
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.