Sheesh. Licensing is hard. =) Having read CC0, I'd be ok with the examples being under that license. I'll let you decide whether you prefer the dual-license complexity. Juan. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Johannes Schönberger <jsch@demuc.de>wrote:

Hi Stefan,

Basically I am OK with this, but doesn't that mean that we have to ask every single person who ever contributed to the examples section for permission?

What's the effort to include a small BSD license footnote to a slide opposed to asking all these people and having two different licenses in the project?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za> wrote:

...

Hi, folks

I just realised that having our examples licensed under BSD technically means that one has to display the license even in slide shows. I'd like to make it as easy as possible for people to advertise our tools, so could we consider relicensing those as CC0?

Regards Stéfan

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.