Dear Daniel,I have not tried solving any of the benchmark phase field problems of the
pfhub website (PFHub: Phase Field Community Hub).


 
PFHub: Phase Field Community Hub



However, I will be solving them (benchmark problems) in nearby future, and most probably
with MOOSE software, as I am currently working with the software. Equally, I am
interested to compare the results of MOOSE with sfepy + fipy .I have not worked yet with
PRISMS , but recently I have read an article on it by Aagesen et al , 2018
(
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs1183701830796); and I am very much
motivated to learn the concept of materials genome initiative and ICME via phase field
methods. So, I will soon learn PRISMS codes on phase field method . I have duly understood
the need of benchmarking phenomenological phase field methods based tools, and so I will
perform benchmark tests with the softwares. I will let you know personally, if I start any
benchmark problems.Thanks for being so inspiring.
Yours Sincerely,Anil Kunwar
On Wednesday, October 3, 2018, 3:58:20 PM GMT+2, Daniel Wheeler
<daniel.wheeler2(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I'd like to solve a number of the phase field benchmark problems
(
https://pages.nist.gov/pfhub/simulations/) using Sfepy if possible.
Also, with some of the other FE solvers out there such as Moose and
Prisims PF. Have you tried solving any of the benchmark problems?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 6:31 PM Anil Kunwar <romagurung33(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Daniel,
It is nice to know about your brilliant works.
I have already used FiPy (in 2015) in my works and so it will be not difficult to know
about the FiPy codes, and currently I am learning sfepy.
I am following your works and simply I am inspired with your updated efforts.
Please keep on updating. Yes, it will be a nice output if sfepy can have independent
codes on phase field equations too (and this is your goal too).
Keep it up.
Yours sincerely,
Anil Kunwar
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:01 PM Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler2(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 7:27 PM Anil Kunwar <romagurung33(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Daniel,
> > How far have you been in coupling linear elasticity with PFM?
> > What are the major challenges in implementing terms for CH equation in sfepy?
>
> Hi Anil,
>
> Currently, I'm solving the linear elasticity with Sfepy and the phase
> field with FiPy. I know that is a bit lame, but I'm hoping to solve it
> all with Sfepy at some point. A link to the code is here,
>
https://github.com/wd15/sfepybm4.
>
> The Sfepy part is
>
https://github.com/wd15/sfepybm4/blob/master/sfepy_module.py and the
> FiPy part,
https://github.com/wd15/sfepybm4/blob/master/fipy_module.py
> and the code to link them is
>
https://github.com/wd15/sfepybm4/blob/master/main.py.
>
> It's almost finished. I need to get the coupling working fully. It
> will be incredibly slow using this approach, but at least it will give
> me an answer.
>
> I'll let you know when it's done.
>
> 
> Daniel Wheeler

Daniel Wheeler