Thanks for the feedback. I guess there's one action item for Mark below: On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 2:58 PM Michael Sullivan <sully@msully.net> wrote:
Overall I like this PEP and am fine with the decision to postpone consideration of changes of the arguments with maybe one caveat: I'd like to be at least reasonably confident that this mechanism can be *extended* into handling parameter modification. It would be unfortunate if we end up with a ton of distinct ways to type decorators.
And with parameter modification I presume you mean that eventually we'll want to be able to describe decorators that add/remove parameters, like the original issue (https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/3157). In particular, I could imaging a decorator that turns printf() into fprintf() and another that does the opposite (sorry for the C analogy). -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>