data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31f9e/31f9e0fab39723ee36926e937d951ccf94298dfd" alt=""
Hi everyone, Are there any outstanding, code-not-documentation issues other than existing pull requests that we need to get in before 3.0 goes out? If not, I'd like to propose a code freeze on the yt-3.0 branch in anticipation of the release, which I would like to shoot for happening by the end of July. Looking over Trello, the only thing that sticks out at me is boundary conditions, which I think needs to wait for 3.1. -Matt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edd05/edd05df6b836af917a88663e386141414690885f" alt=""
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Are there any outstanding, code-not-documentation issues other than existing pull requests that we need to get in before 3.0 goes out?
+1
If not, I'd like to propose a code freeze on the yt-3.0 branch in anticipation of the release, which I would like to shoot for happening by the end of July.
Looking over Trello, the only thing that sticks out at me is boundary conditions, which I think needs to wait for 3.1.
What should we do with the remaining failing cookbook recipes? Some of them require code changes to fix them.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31f9e/31f9e0fab39723ee36926e937d951ccf94298dfd" alt=""
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Are there any outstanding, code-not-documentation issues other than existing pull requests that we need to get in before 3.0 goes out?
+1
If not, I'd like to propose a code freeze on the yt-3.0 branch in anticipation of the release, which I would like to shoot for happening by the end of July.
Looking over Trello, the only thing that sticks out at me is boundary conditions, which I think needs to wait for 3.1.
What should we do with the remaining failing cookbook recipes? Some of them require code changes to fix them.
How about special case for accepting bugfixes related to existing docs?
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edd05/edd05df6b836af917a88663e386141414690885f" alt=""
Sounds good - no new features, only bugfixes. On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com>
Hi everyone,
Are there any outstanding, code-not-documentation issues other than existing pull requests that we need to get in before 3.0 goes out?
+1
If not, I'd like to propose a code freeze on the yt-3.0 branch in anticipation of the release, which I would like to shoot for happening by the end of July.
Looking over Trello, the only thing that sticks out at me is boundary conditions, which I think needs to wait for 3.1.
What should we do with the remaining failing cookbook recipes? Some of
wrote: them
require code changes to fix them.
How about special case for accepting bugfixes related to existing docs?
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e769a/e769a49ec6b1d42ca934cb38a45bc08c9e429355" alt=""
The issue I've been going back-and-forth on making new particle filters generate deposit fields which show up in the derived_field_list is something that I've put off working on the last couple of days, but I think it's a bug that shoudl be fixed prior to release. Other than that, it seems like just the failing cookbook fixes are the remaining code fixes, I think. On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Are there any outstanding, code-not-documentation issues other than existing pull requests that we need to get in before 3.0 goes out?
+1
If not, I'd like to propose a code freeze on the yt-3.0 branch in anticipation of the release, which I would like to shoot for happening by the end of July.
Looking over Trello, the only thing that sticks out at me is boundary conditions, which I think needs to wait for 3.1.
What should we do with the remaining failing cookbook recipes? Some of them require code changes to fix them.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31f9e/31f9e0fab39723ee36926e937d951ccf94298dfd" alt=""
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
The issue I've been going back-and-forth on making new particle filters generate deposit fields which show up in the derived_field_list is something that I've put off working on the last couple of days, but I think it's a bug that shoudl be fixed prior to release. Other than that, it seems like just the failing cookbook fixes are the remaining code fixes, I think.
I think just appending them, like I suggested in my previous email, should fix it. Tomorrow during the doc sprint we can see if that fixes it.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Are there any outstanding, code-not-documentation issues other than existing pull requests that we need to get in before 3.0 goes out?
+1
If not, I'd like to propose a code freeze on the yt-3.0 branch in anticipation of the release, which I would like to shoot for happening by the end of July.
Looking over Trello, the only thing that sticks out at me is boundary conditions, which I think needs to wait for 3.1.
What should we do with the remaining failing cookbook recipes? Some of them require code changes to fix them.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edd05/edd05df6b836af917a88663e386141414690885f" alt=""
One more thought. What about matplotlib 1.4? I was planning on updating the install script for some of our python dependencies when matplotlib 1.4 shipped. I'd feel much more comfortable if we could include that in the install script as part of the yt-3 release due to the issue with ndarray subclasses in matplotlib 1.3.1. According to the matplotlib-devel mailing list, they're planning on releasing on July 26th (well, really, "two weeks from today" in an e-mail on July 12), but no telling if anything will actually be released that day. -Nathan On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
The issue I've been going back-and-forth on making new particle filters generate deposit fields which show up in the derived_field_list is something that I've put off working on the last couple of days, but I think it's a bug that shoudl be fixed prior to release. Other than that, it seems like just the failing cookbook fixes are the remaining code fixes, I think.
I think just appending them, like I suggested in my previous email, should fix it. Tomorrow during the doc sprint we can see if that fixes it.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Are there any outstanding, code-not-documentation issues other than existing pull requests that we need to get in before 3.0 goes out?
+1
If not, I'd like to propose a code freeze on the yt-3.0 branch in anticipation of the release, which I would like to shoot for happening by the end of July.
Looking over Trello, the only thing that sticks out at me is boundary conditions, which I think needs to wait for 3.1.
What should we do with the remaining failing cookbook recipes? Some of them require code changes to fix them.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/666e9/666e946c3e457ddbe9c51078ef755d608f619878" alt=""
Tomorrow I'd like to submit one final PR with the fixes for Windows. On Jul 17, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
One more thought. What about matplotlib 1.4? I was planning on updating the install script for some of our python dependencies when matplotlib 1.4 shipped.
I'd feel much more comfortable if we could include that in the install script as part of the yt-3 release due to the issue with ndarray subclasses in matplotlib 1.3.1. According to the matplotlib-devel mailing list, they're planning on releasing on July 26th (well, really, "two weeks from today" in an e-mail on July 12), but no telling if anything will actually be released that day.
-Nathan
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
The issue I've been going back-and-forth on making new particle filters generate deposit fields which show up in the derived_field_list is something that I've put off working on the last couple of days, but I think it's a bug that shoudl be fixed prior to release. Other than that, it seems like just the failing cookbook fixes are the remaining code fixes, I think.
I think just appending them, like I suggested in my previous email, should fix it. Tomorrow during the doc sprint we can see if that fixes it.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Are there any outstanding, code-not-documentation issues other than existing pull requests that we need to get in before 3.0 goes out?
+1
If not, I'd like to propose a code freeze on the yt-3.0 branch in anticipation of the release, which I would like to shoot for happening by the end of July.
Looking over Trello, the only thing that sticks out at me is boundary conditions, which I think needs to wait for 3.1.
What should we do with the remaining failing cookbook recipes? Some of them require code changes to fix them.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31f9e/31f9e0fab39723ee36926e937d951ccf94298dfd" alt=""
Sounds good, that'll be great to have in. On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:33 PM, John ZuHone <jzuhone@gmail.com> wrote:
Tomorrow I'd like to submit one final PR with the fixes for Windows.
On Jul 17, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
One more thought. What about matplotlib 1.4? I was planning on updating the install script for some of our python dependencies when matplotlib 1.4 shipped.
I'd feel much more comfortable if we could include that in the install script as part of the yt-3 release due to the issue with ndarray subclasses in matplotlib 1.3.1. According to the matplotlib-devel mailing list, they're planning on releasing on July 26th (well, really, "two weeks from today" in an e-mail on July 12), but no telling if anything will actually be released that day.
-Nathan
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
The issue I've been going back-and-forth on making new particle filters generate deposit fields which show up in the derived_field_list is something that I've put off working on the last couple of days, but I think it's a bug that shoudl be fixed prior to release. Other than that, it seems like just the failing cookbook fixes are the remaining code fixes, I think.
I think just appending them, like I suggested in my previous email, should fix it. Tomorrow during the doc sprint we can see if that fixes it.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Are there any outstanding, code-not-documentation issues other than existing pull requests that we need to get in before 3.0 goes out?
+1
If not, I'd like to propose a code freeze on the yt-3.0 branch in anticipation of the release, which I would like to shoot for happening by the end of July.
Looking over Trello, the only thing that sticks out at me is boundary conditions, which I think needs to wait for 3.1.
What should we do with the remaining failing cookbook recipes? Some of them require code changes to fix them.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31f9e/31f9e0fab39723ee36926e937d951ccf94298dfd" alt=""
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
One more thought. What about matplotlib 1.4? I was planning on updating the install script for some of our python dependencies when matplotlib 1.4 shipped.
I'd feel much more comfortable if we could include that in the install script as part of the yt-3 release due to the issue with ndarray subclasses in matplotlib 1.3.1. According to the matplotlib-devel mailing list, they're planning on releasing on July 26th (well, really, "two weeks from today" in an e-mail on July 12), but no telling if anything will actually be released that day.
Yes, assuming there are no other issues that 1.4 brings up, I'm fine with including it in the install script. I would like us to target a release between July 25 and 30. That means I'm going to attempt to have everything ready to go on the 25th, and when it is ready the buttons can be pushed. I'll create a release checklist on Trello tomorrow before the doc sprint for non-doc stuff that has to happen.
-Nathan
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels@gmail.com> wrote:
The issue I've been going back-and-forth on making new particle filters generate deposit fields which show up in the derived_field_list is something that I've put off working on the last couple of days, but I think it's a bug that shoudl be fixed prior to release. Other than that, it seems like just the failing cookbook fixes are the remaining code fixes, I think.
I think just appending them, like I suggested in my previous email, should fix it. Tomorrow during the doc sprint we can see if that fixes it.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Are there any outstanding, code-not-documentation issues other than existing pull requests that we need to get in before 3.0 goes out?
+1
If not, I'd like to propose a code freeze on the yt-3.0 branch in anticipation of the release, which I would like to shoot for happening by the end of July.
Looking over Trello, the only thing that sticks out at me is boundary conditions, which I think needs to wait for 3.1.
What should we do with the remaining failing cookbook recipes? Some of them require code changes to fix them.
-Matt _______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
-- Cameron Hummels Postdoctoral Researcher Steward Observatory University of Arizona http://chummels.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
_______________________________________________ yt-dev mailing list yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
participants (4)
-
Cameron Hummels
-
John ZuHone
-
Matthew Turk
-
Nathan Goldbaum