[Catalog-sig] [Proposal] Registered packages must provide the source code distribution on PyPI
mal at egenix.com
Thu Jun 17 09:57:52 CEST 2010
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> For such packages: send out an email to the package maintainer informing
>> him about the problem and instructing him to fix the problem within N
>> After N days: recheck the package state and unregister the package if
>> Or perhaps a less rude approach: introduce status field for each package
>> (ACTIVE/INACTIVE) and set the state to INACTIVE when the package does
>> not comply with this policy. Inactive packages won't be listed on PyPI
>> and won't be searchable on PyPI. Inactive status should be visible
>> to the author (in logged-in state) with some warning "Package is
>> inactive..please upload your sdist....).
> Ok. If nobody opposes to this right now, it's fine with me as well.
> However, I won't be able to work on this for several months to come.
> IMO, it's a waste of energy: if a package is useless, just don't use it,
> and be done. There are many packages on PyPI that are useless to me
> despite having a source release.
PyPI can't replace the due-diligence that every package user has to
apply before making a choice to invest time into using it.
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jun 17 2010)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
2010-07-19: EuroPython 2010, Birmingham, UK 31 days to go
::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::
eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
More information about the Catalog-SIG