[Catalog-sig] PEP 345 Update
pnasrat at google.com
Tue Oct 5 18:26:57 CEST 2010
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Alexis Métaireau <alexis at notmyidea.org> wrote:
> Hey all,
> Sorry for this long silence; I'm now back on track.
> Le 08/28/2010 04:27 AM, P.J. Eby a écrit :
>> At 05:08 PM 8/27/2010 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> P.J. Eby wrote:
>>> FWIW, I helped add those fields to PEP 345, in the context of making the
>>> switch from "module / package"-centric values to distribution-centric
>>> ones. The requirements came out of a sprint at PyCon 2009, with input
>>> from both the Debian / Ubuntu Python packager (Matthias Klose) and one
>>> of the Fedora packagers (Toshio Kuratomi).
>> Great - could we get them to join in on this discussion to explain what
>> it is that they want the creators of Python libraries to put in these
>> fields, and what they intend to do with the information once it's there?
> +1 on that. We need to have inputs on that: that's good to have fields,
> but it's more important to know how they are supposed to be considered.
> Any news about that ? Do someone have email adresses of Matthias Klose
> and Toshio Kuratomi ?
Fedora python people are listed here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ToshioKuratomi should have enough for
you to email him.
More information about the Catalog-SIG