[Chicago] SCons

[curtin@acm.org]

Just curious -- is there something particularly wrong with using
distutils.core?

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Kumar McMillan
<kumar.mcmillan at gmail.com>wrote:

> Garrett, I haven't used SCons but I looked at a bunch of similar tools
> briefly:
> http://farmdev.com/thoughts/46/the-python-make-tool/
>
> It sounds like you might want something more like zc.buildout, maybe
> for http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.recipe.cmmi/ (thinking it might
> help to compile java?)
>
> zc.buildout docs are a little hard to follow but it's kinda nice once
> you see how it works.
>
> You may also want to look closely at Paver.
>
> PS. don't use distutils.core ;)
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Garrett Smith <g at rrett.us.com> wrote:
> > Anyone have experience with SCons?
> >
> > http://www.scons.org/
> >
> > I'm in the market for something like ant, but without the hemmorrhaging
> > suckage. I realize that setuptools is the standard for most Python build
> > tasks, but I need something that's adept at compiling stuff like Java and
> > .NET.
> >
> > There's some interesting work in Ruby world (rake, rbuildr, etc.) but
> > nothing feels quiet simple enough.
> >
> > Garrett
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chicago mailing list
> > Chicago at python.org
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20080813/89495212/attachment.htm>