[Chicago] P != NP

[Dan Krol]

It should also be stated that (at least from what I've read) this is
nowhere near victory. It has to be reviewed for mistakes, and a lot of
people have claimed to have made a proof in the past. This is
apparently a much more serious attempt, however.

On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Brian Herman <brianherman at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP/Deolalikar.pdf
> Is there any python math geeks that can shed some light on this.
> I know this is important but I don't know why.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian Herman
>
> brianjherman.com
> Research Assistant
> University Of Illinois at Chicago
> brianherman at acm.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>