[Chicago] P != NP

[Brian Herman]

I am reading the wikipedia page so no links to that please.

Thanks,
Brian Herman

brianjherman.com
Research Assistant
University Of Illinois at Chicago
brianherman at acm.org








On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Dan Krol <orblivion at gmail.com> wrote:

> It should also be stated that (at least from what I've read) this is
> nowhere near victory. It has to be reviewed for mistakes, and a lot of
> people have claimed to have made a proof in the past. This is
> apparently a much more serious attempt, however.
>
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Brian Herman <brianherman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP/Deolalikar.pdf<http://www.win.tue.nl/%7Egwoegi/P-versus-NP/Deolalikar.pdf>
> > Is there any python math geeks that can shed some light on this.
> > I know this is important but I don't know why.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brian Herman
> >
> > brianjherman.com
> > Research Assistant
> > University Of Illinois at Chicago
> > brianherman at acm.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chicago mailing list
> > Chicago at python.org
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20100808/a25ee68d/attachment.html>