[Chicago] Golang vs Python slides

kirby urner kirby.urner at gmail.com
Sat May 16 18:34:46 CEST 2015


> The more I think about it, the more I wish I had infinite free time to
> just re-write it in Go and see what happens :P
>
>
Me too, and infinite brains to go with the time. :-D

A followup question would be:

Give we have ways to extend CPython in C++ etc. might we have a way to
architect modules in Go that CPython could import?

During execution, control would be handed over to Go, so concurrency
problems might be solved even if the GIL is not actually bypassed.

Even with GIL, a Go extension module might just be more intuitive and
easier to maintain, yet Python coders get an API they can use directly?

Just a thought.

Python controls a Tk process written in tcl, and the wx process written in
C++ (wxPython), so some kind of bridge to Go stuff seems in the cards.

Kirby



>
>
> Chris Foresman
> chris at chrisforesman.com
>
>
>
> On May 15, 2015, at 10:13 PM, kirby urner <kirby.urner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> how about Python *implemented* in Go, what would that look like?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20150516/4a3ea944/attachment.html>


More information about the Chicago mailing list